{"id":6303,"date":"2026-02-13T13:40:46","date_gmt":"2026-02-13T13:40:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/2026\/02\/13\/vulnerable-dem-senator-slammed-for-requiring-photo-id-at-rally-but-not-to-vote\/"},"modified":"2026-02-13T13:40:46","modified_gmt":"2026-02-13T13:40:46","slug":"vulnerable-dem-senator-slammed-for-requiring-photo-id-at-rally-but-not-to-vote","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/2026\/02\/13\/vulnerable-dem-senator-slammed-for-requiring-photo-id-at-rally-but-not-to-vote\/","title":{"rendered":"Vulnerable Dem senator slammed for requiring photo ID at rally, but not to vote"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"speakable\">A new attack ad from Republicans targeting U.S. Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., is slamming the vulnerable Democrat senator for requiring entrants at his political rallies to show proof of identification, but arguing that identification requirements for voting are a form of voter suppression.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"speakable\"><i>&#8216;<\/i>Want to get into a Jon Ossoff rally?&#8217; the advertisement&#8217;s narrator begins, before it goes into a montage of staffers at Ossoff&#8217;s Feb. 7 rally asking for entrants&#8217; IDs.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Don\u2019t forget your ID&#8217; rally staff can be heard saying as folks walked into the Georgia International Convention Center located in metro Atlanta.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Also, do you have your ID with you?&#8217; another staffer can be heard asking entrants in the video captured by a GOP tracker. &#8216;I\u2019ll just grab your ID from you. Thank you so much,&#8217; another said. <i>&#8216;<\/i>Please have your IDs ready, please, thank you.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Ossoff has referred to attempts to establish stricter photo-identification rules for voting and voter registration in federal elections as &#8216;nakedly partisan, totally unworkable, [and] bad faith.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Ossoff&#8217;s team declined to comment for this story.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>On Wednesday, Republicans in the House of Representatives passed the latest iteration of a voter integrity law aiming at requiring stricter in-person documentation requirements, such as needing a photo-ID to vote. This bill is a broader and stricter version of the 2025 version of the bill which focused predominantly on registering to vote as opposed to the act of voting itself.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Ahead of the vote&#8217;s passage, one of Ossoff&#8217;s Republican challengers in the upcoming U.S. Senate race in Georgia, Rep. Buddy Carter, R-Ga., called out the incumbent Democrat Senator for &#8216;once [saying] that voter ID was &#8216;right and appropriate,&#8217;&nbsp;[but] now supports his party as&nbsp;reframing it as &#8216;voter suppression.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;The law didn\u2019t change. Public opinion didn\u2019t change. What changed was he \u2013 and other Democrat politicians like&nbsp;him \u2013 realized that illegal immigrants could no longer vote to keep Democrats in office,&#8217; Carter asserted. &#8216;They oppose this bill because it chips away at their voting base; plain and simple.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Despite Ossoff&#8217;s previous opposition to voter integrity laws, his campaign event framed the requirement for photo ID as a security measure.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Due to security requirements \u2026 be ready to show ID that matches our RSVP list and these arrival instructions (printed or on your phone),&#8217; the campaign event\u2019s confirmation email said.<\/p>\n<p><i>Fox News Digital&#8217;s Leo Briceno contributed to this report.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>This post appeared first on FOX NEWS<\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A new attack ad from Republicans targeting U.S. Sen. Jon Ossoff, D-Ga., is slamming the vulnerable Democrat senator for requiring entrants at his political rallies to show proof of identification, but arguing that identification requirements for voting are a form of voter suppression.&nbsp; &#8216;Want to get into a Jon Ossoff rally?&#8217; the advertisement&#8217;s narrator begins,&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6304,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6303","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-world-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6303","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6303"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6303\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6304"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6303"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6303"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6303"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}