{"id":6251,"date":"2026-02-11T13:39:57","date_gmt":"2026-02-11T13:39:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/2026\/02\/11\/geopolitics-power-and-resources-collide-as-global-order-frays\/"},"modified":"2026-02-11T13:39:57","modified_gmt":"2026-02-11T13:39:57","slug":"geopolitics-power-and-resources-collide-as-global-order-frays","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/2026\/02\/11\/geopolitics-power-and-resources-collide-as-global-order-frays\/","title":{"rendered":"Geopolitics, Power and Resources Collide as Global Order Frays"},"content":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n

Rising geopolitical tensions, intensifying competition for critical minerals and the accelerating breakdown of the postwar global order were some of the key themes at the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference (VRIC) in late January, as investors grappled with what a volatile world means for capital, commodities and security of supply.<\/strong><\/p>\n

In a wide-ranging panel moderated by Jesse Day, legendary mining financier Frank Giustra joined retired US Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor and geopolitical analyst Dr. Pascal Lottaz to examine flashpoints from Iran to Greenland, and why resource investors can no longer separate geopolitics from the metals that underpin modern economies.<\/p>\n

Giustra, president and CEO of Fiore Group and co-chair of the International Crisis Group, opened the discussion by warning that tensions with Iran are approaching a critical threshold, driven by competing US and Israeli objectives.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\u201cIsrael would like to see Iran taken out as a major regional power,\u201d Giustra said. \u201cThe US would like to see a different Iran \u2014 one it could do business with and that has stable relations with its neighbours. Those objectives are not the same.\u201d<\/p>\n

He added that the presence of a US carrier strike group in the region underscores the risk of escalation, but questioned whether military action would achieve Washington\u2019s goals. \u201cIran is simply too large for a strike to have the intended effect,\u201d he said, pointing to the absence of a coherent long-term policy.<\/p>\n

Colonel Macgregor was more blunt, warning the US is \u201con the precipice of war\u201d with Iran and arguing that Washington\u2019s strategic thinking mirrors failed efforts elsewhere.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is the same mindset that committed us to war in Ukraine,\u201d Macgregor said. \u201cDestroy the country, divide it, dominate it, and take its resources. It failed there, and it will fail in Iran.\u201d<\/p>\n

Dr. Lottaz, an adjunct researcher at Waseda University in Tokyo and host of the ‘Neutrality Studies’ channel, said unpredictability has become the defining feature of US foreign policy.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat Israel does is done in conjunction with the US \u2014 they are effectively one team,\u201d Lottaz said. \u201cCarrier groups sitting offshore are not just deterrence. They are also sitting ducks. Ships can sink.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

Greenland, minerals and power politics <\/h3>\n

The panel then turned to Greenland, a region increasingly viewed through the lens of critical minerals and Arctic security.<\/p>\n

Giustra dismissed claims that Greenland poses an immediate security risk from Russia or China, arguing instead that resource competition is the real driver. \u201cGreenland has always been open for business,\u201d he said. <\/p>\n

\u201cThe idea that the US needs to own it to access minerals is simply false.\u201d<\/p>\n

Instead, Giustra described Washington\u2019s posture as coercive. \u201cIt\u2019s essentially putting a gun to Greenland\u2019s head and saying, \u2018We want to buy you.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

For mining investors, Greenland represents both opportunity and risk. <\/p>\n

The island hosts significant deposits of rare earth elements, graphite and other strategic metals essential to clean energy technologies, defence systems and advanced manufacturing. But political uncertainty, including pressure from major powers, complicates development timelines and capital allocation.<\/p>\n

Macgregor argued that US ambitions in Greenland and Venezuela reflect more optics than strategy. \u201cThis administration loves big gestures,\u201d he said. \u201cBut unless you control what happens on the ground, nothing really changes.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Europe\u2019s energy crisis and deindustrialization <\/h3>\n

Lottaz traced Europe\u2019s economic strain, particularly Germany\u2019s deindustrialization, back to energy policy decisions, including the shutdown of nuclear power and the loss of Russian gas supplies.<\/p>\n

\u201cPolitical leadership in Europe is increasingly detached from national interests,\u201d he said. \u201cWhat matters more is positioning within EU and transatlantic institutions.\u201d<\/p>\n

That disconnect has direct consequences for resource markets, particularly energy-intensive industries such as metals refining, steel production and battery manufacturing, which depend on stable, affordable power.<\/p>\n

Macgregor added that many global institutions, including NATO and the European Union, are approaching \u201cblock obsolescence,\u201d forcing investors to rethink long-held assumptions about stability.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Critical minerals and the risk of conflict <\/h3>\n

As the discussion widened, Giustra pointed to critical minerals as one of the most dangerous fault lines in the emerging world order.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe intense competition between China and the West over critical minerals is a major factor,\u201d he said. \u201cThese are not just economic assets \u2014 they\u2019re strategic weapons.\u201d<\/p>\n

China currently dominates processing of rare earth elements, lithium chemicals and battery-grade materials, giving it leverage over Western supply chains. Efforts by the US, Europe and allies to secure alternative sources \u2014 from Greenland to Africa to South America \u2014 are reshaping investment flows across the mining sector.<\/p>\n

Giustra warned that history shows transitions between declining and rising powers are rarely peaceful. \u201cThe danger of conflict during a shift in world order is extremely high,\u201d he said. \u201cWe may already be setting the stage for something far worse.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Is there room for optimism? <\/h3>\n

Despite the grim outlook, Lottaz offered cautious optimism, arguing that even strained international systems retain some restraining influence.<\/p>\n

\u201cEveryone still claims to operate under the UN Charter, even when they violate it,\u201d he said. \u201cThat tells us the idea of international law still matters.\u201d<\/p>\n

He also pointed to restraint in conflicts such as Ukraine, noting that NATO has avoided direct war with Russia. \u201cThere is still rationality at work. No one wants Armageddon.\u201d<\/p>\n

Macgregor closed with a stark reminder for investors and policymakers alike. \u201cRules only exist if someone enforces them,\u201d he said. \u201cAs American power recedes, we\u2019re entering a far more competitive and uncertain world.\u201d<\/p>\n

For the resource sector, that uncertainty translates into higher geopolitical risk, but also strategic opportunity. As governments scramble to secure supply chains for energy transition metals, defence materials and critical infrastructure, mining projects once considered peripheral are moving to the centre of global power politics.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Securities Disclosure: I, Georgia Williams, hold no direct investment interest in any company mentioned in this article.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

This post appeared first on investingnews.com<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rising geopolitical tensions, intensifying competition for critical minerals and the accelerating breakdown of the postwar global order were some of the key themes at the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference (VRIC) in late January, as investors grappled with what a volatile world means for capital, commodities and security of supply. In a wide-ranging panel moderated by…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6252,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6251","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-investing"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6251","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6251"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6251\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6252"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6251"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6251"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}