{"id":5498,"date":"2025-12-31T13:40:00","date_gmt":"2025-12-31T13:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/2025\/12\/31\/putin-residence-drone-attack-dismissed-as-implausible-as-ukraine-accusations-mount\/"},"modified":"2025-12-31T13:40:00","modified_gmt":"2025-12-31T13:40:00","slug":"putin-residence-drone-attack-dismissed-as-implausible-as-ukraine-accusations-mount","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/2025\/12\/31\/putin-residence-drone-attack-dismissed-as-implausible-as-ukraine-accusations-mount\/","title":{"rendered":"Putin residence drone attack dismissed as \u2018implausible\u2019 as Ukraine accusations mount"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"speakable\">Escalating claims by Russia that Ukraine tried to hit a residence used by President Vladimir Putin with drones have been dismissed by a top military drone expert, who called the alleged attack &#8216;hard to fathom&#8217; and tactically implausible.<\/p>\n<p class=\"speakable\">Cameron Chell&#8217;s comments came as Moscow doubled down on accusations Kyiv has flatly denied, with the drone industry leader arguing the alleged strike announced Monday runs counter to Ukraine\u2019s drone tactics.<\/p>\n<p>Chell, the CEO and co-founder of Draganfly, a drone manufacturer that supplies to the U.S. Department of Defense and allied militaries, including Ukraine, said Russia&#8217;s claims lack credibility.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;What really makes things usually very signature about Ukraine is that they\u2019re always incredibly clever about how they use drones,&#8217; Chell told Fox News Digital.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;They are clever from a cost perspective \u2014 let\u2019s call it an efficiency perspective \u2014 but also very clever in their tactics,&#8217; he added.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;I find it hard to fathom that this drone attack even happened on Putin\u2019s residence or that it was something that Ukraine orchestrated for a number of reasons,&#8217; Chell said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;To get over the top of Putin\u2019s residence, for one, the drones would not have been launched from a very long distance away,&#8217; he added.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Chell\u2019s comments came as Russia doubled down Tuesday on accusations that Ukraine attempted to strike a presidential palace in the Novgorod region using drones, allegedly to disrupt peace efforts.<\/p>\n<p>Kyiv dismissed the allegation, with the timing also raising questions given the upbeat tone of a recent meeting between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Florida.<\/p>\n<p>Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov claimed late Monday that 91 drones were intercepted en route to Putin\u2019s residence on the shores of Lake Valdai.<\/p>\n<p>His statement appeared to contradict earlier Defense Ministry tallies, which said 89 drones were shot down over eight regions, including 18 over Novgorod, later adding another 23.<\/p>\n<p>Only after Lavrov spoke did the ministry allege that 49 drones intercepted over Bryansk, nearly 300 miles away, were also targeting Valdai.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>Asked about wreckage, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said it was &#8216;a matter for our military,&#8217; while calling Zelenskyy\u2019s denial and Western skepticism &#8216;completely insane.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Peskov said Russia\u2019s diplomatic stance would be toughened, and Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin vowed there could be &#8216;no forgiveness&#8217; for Zelenskyy.<\/p>\n<p>Chell said the story simply does not add up. &#8216;To attack Putin\u2019s residence, you need long-range, very fast-moving drones,&#8217; he said.<\/p>\n<p>He added that for drones that small to reach such a site, they would have had to be launched from a much closer location, likely inside Russia itself.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;They would have to be within about 10 kilometers [6.2 miles] \u2014 or maybe, at most, 30 kilometers \u2014 of Putin\u2019s residence,&#8217; Chell said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;That facility where Putin lives would also be incredibly secure, and so to have a number of lower-cost, slower-moving drones coming in on that facility would be very un-Ukrainian,&#8217; Chell said.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Ukraine also doesn\u2019t announce when they\u2019re going to show up,&#8217; he added.<\/p>\n<p>Chell also noted that night operations would rule out GPS- or AI-based navigation due to jamming and visibility limits, making the launch of dozens of drones even less plausible.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Apparently the thing was at night, so that\u2019s very difficult for machine vision or AI mapping software,&#8217; he said. &#8216;So, you know, it definitely wasn\u2019t using GPS, because it would have been jammed. There are just a bunch of things that don\u2019t add up.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Politically, Chell argued, Ukraine has nothing to gain. &#8216;They\u2019re bold, but right in the middle of peace talks \u2014 when they need Trump on side \u2014 it makes no sense,&#8217; he said. &#8216;Ukraine is just politically too smart to have done that.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Zelenskyy on Monday also called the claim a complete fabrication, accusing Moscow of laying the groundwork for further attacks.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Lavrov warned of retaliation but said Russia would continue talks with Washington.<\/p>\n<p>Trump also said he learned of the alleged attack directly from Putin and was &#8216;very angry about it.&#8217; Asked whether there was evidence, Trump replied, &#8216;We\u2019ll find out.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Fox News Digital has reached out to the Kremlin for comment.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>This post appeared first on FOX NEWS<\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Escalating claims by Russia that Ukraine tried to hit a residence used by President Vladimir Putin with drones have been dismissed by a top military drone expert, who called the alleged attack &#8216;hard to fathom&#8217; and tactically implausible. Cameron Chell&#8217;s comments came as Moscow doubled down on accusations Kyiv has flatly denied, with the drone&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5499,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5498","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-world-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5498","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5498"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5498\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5499"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5498"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5498"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5498"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}