{"id":2394,"date":"2025-07-18T13:45:48","date_gmt":"2025-07-18T13:45:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/2025\/07\/18\/congress-sends-9b-spending-cuts-package-to-trumps-desk-after-late-night-house-vote\/"},"modified":"2025-07-18T13:45:48","modified_gmt":"2025-07-18T13:45:48","slug":"congress-sends-9b-spending-cuts-package-to-trumps-desk-after-late-night-house-vote","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/2025\/07\/18\/congress-sends-9b-spending-cuts-package-to-trumps-desk-after-late-night-house-vote\/","title":{"rendered":"Congress sends $9B spending cuts package to Trump\u2019s desk after late-night House vote"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"speakable\">Congress is officially sending a package detailing $9 billion in spending cuts to President Donald Trump\u2019s desk, minutes after midnight on Friday.<\/p>\n<p class=\"speakable\">The bill, called a &#8216;rescissions package,&#8217; was approved by the House of Representatives in a late-night 216 to 213 vote after intense debate between Republicans and Democrats. Just two Republicans, Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., and Mike Turner, R-Ohio, voted in opposition.<\/p>\n<p>Friday was also the deadline for passing the legislation, otherwise the White House would be forced to re-obligate those funds as planned.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s a victory for House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., but a mostly symbolic one \u2013 the spending cuts bill was largely seen by Trump allies as a test run of a fiscal claw-back process not used in more than two decades.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;This bill tonight is part of continuing that trend of getting spending under control. Does it answer all the problems? No. $9 billion, I would say is a good start,&#8217; House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said during debate on the bill.<\/p>\n<p>When signed by Trump, it will block $8 billion in funding to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and $1 billion to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting for the remainder of the fiscal year. The dollars had been allocated by Congress for the duration of fiscal year 2025.<\/p>\n<p>Republicans celebrated it as a victory for cutting off the flow of U.S. taxpayer dollars to what they called &#8216;woke&#8217; initiatives abroad, while Democrats accused the right of gutting critical foreign aid.<\/p>\n<p>Rescissions packages are a way for the president to have input in Congress\u2019 yearly appropriations process. The White House sends a proposal to block some congressionally obligated funds, which lawmakers have 45 days to get through the House and Senate.<\/p>\n<p>Republicans have also been able to sideline Democrats so far, with the rescissions process lowering the Senate\u2019s threshold for passage from 60 votes to 51.<\/p>\n<p>The last time a rescissions package was signed into law was 1999.<\/p>\n<p>Consideration of the bill began with a House Rules Committee hearing at 6 p.m. on Thursday evening.<\/p>\n<p>Democrats attempted multiple times throughout the process to weaponize the ongoing inter-GOP fallout over the Jeffrey Epstein case, both in the House Rules Committee and on the chamber floor during debate on the bill.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Multiple calls were made for votes to force the release of the so-called Epstein &#8216;files.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;If every Republican votes to block our attempt to release the records, they are telling Epstein&#8217;s victims, you don&#8217;t matter as much as our political convenience. And that should disgust every single one of us,&#8217; said Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass.<\/p>\n<p>Far-right GOP figures are demanding accountability, while Trump has called on his base to move on after the Department of Justice (DOJ) signaled the case was closed.<\/p>\n<p>Initial plans to begin advancing the bill earlier in the day were quickly scuttled, with Republicans on the committee being concerned about being put into a difficult position with potential Epstein votes.<\/p>\n<p>In the end, a compromise led to the House Rules Committee advancing a separate nonbinding measure dealing with Epstein transparency, on a parallel track to the rescissions bill.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"pdf-container\" style=\"height:860px\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>&#8216;All the credible evidence should come out. I&#8217;ve been very clear with members of the House Rules Committee. Republicans have been taking the incoming criticism because they voted to stop the Democrats&#8217; politicization of this, and they&#8217;re trying to stick to their job and move their procedural rules to the floor so we can do our work and get the rescissions done for the American people,&#8217; Johnson told reporters during negotiations earlier in the day.<\/p>\n<p>Democrats nevertheless pressed on, mentioning Epstein multiple times on the House floor. McGovern even briefly led a chant of &#8216;release the files&#8217; when closing debate on the bill.<\/p>\n<p>Republicans, in turn, accused Democrats of hypocrisy.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Interesting how they talk about Jeffrey Epstein, because for four years, Mr. Speaker, President Joe Biden had those files, and not a single Democrat that you&#8217;re hearing tonight tried to get those files released,&#8217; House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said at one point during the House floor debate.<\/p>\n<p>The House initially voted to advance a $9.4 billion rescissions package, but it was trimmed somewhat&nbsp;in the Senate&nbsp;after some senators had concerns about cutting funding for HIV\/AIDS prevention research in Africa.<\/p>\n<p>Trump is expected to sign the bill on Friday.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>This post appeared first on FOX NEWS<\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Congress is officially sending a package detailing $9 billion in spending cuts to President Donald Trump\u2019s desk, minutes after midnight on Friday. The bill, called a &#8216;rescissions package,&#8217; was approved by the House of Representatives in a late-night 216 to 213 vote after intense debate between Republicans and Democrats. Just two Republicans, Reps. Brian Fitzpatrick,&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2395,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2394","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-world-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2394","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2394"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2394\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2395"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2394"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}