{"id":1206,"date":"2025-05-31T13:52:07","date_gmt":"2025-05-31T13:52:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/2025\/05\/31\/u-s-foreign-tax-bill-sends-jitters-across-wall-street\/"},"modified":"2025-05-31T13:52:07","modified_gmt":"2025-05-31T13:52:07","slug":"u-s-foreign-tax-bill-sends-jitters-across-wall-street","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/2025\/05\/31\/u-s-foreign-tax-bill-sends-jitters-across-wall-street\/","title":{"rendered":"U.S. foreign tax bill sends jitters across Wall Street"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class='body-graf'>While U.S. President Donald Trump\u2019s tariffs play out in U.S. courts, another one of his proposed laws could weaponize the American tax system.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>Investment banks and law firms warn this step could prove to be as significant as the impact of duties on investors.<\/p>\n<div id='taboolaReadMoreBelow'><\/div>\n<p class='body-graf'>The \u201cOne Big Beautiful Bill Act,\u201d which passed through the U.S. House of Representatives last week, includes the most sweeping changes to the tax treatment of foreign capital in the U.S. in decades under a provision known as Section 899. The bill must still gain the Senate\u2019s approval.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>\u201cWe see this legislation as creating the scope for the US administration to transform a trade war into a capital war if it so wishes,\u201d said George Saravelos, global head of FX research at Deutsche Bank on Thursday.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>\u201cSection 899 challenges the open nature of US capital markets by explicitly using taxation on foreign holdings of US assets as leverage to further US economic goals,\u201d Saravelos added in the note to clients, under the subtitle \u201cweaponization of US capital markets in to law.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>Section 899 says it will hit entities from \u201cdiscriminatory foreign countries\u201d \u2014 those that impose levies such as the digital services taxes that disproportionately affect U.S. companies.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>France, for instance, has a 3% tax on revenues from online platforms, which primarily targets big technology firms such as Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Germany is reportedly considering a similar tax of 10%.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>Under the new tax bill, the U.S. would hit investors from such countries by increasing taxes on U.S. income by 5 percentage points each year, potentially taking the rate up to 20%.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>Emmanuel Cau, head of European Equity Strategy at Barclays, suggested that the mere passage of the tax legislation could make dollar assets less valuable for foreign investors.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>\u201cIn our view, this is a risk for those companies generating US revenues, and domiciled in countries that have enacted Digital Services Taxes (DST) or are implementing the OECD\u2019s Under Taxed Payment Rule (UTPR),\u201d Cau said in a Friday note to clients.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>He highlighted companies such as London-listed Compass Group, which provides catering services to U.S. schools, and InterContinental Hotels, which owns at least 25 luxury hotels in the U.S., are likely to be affected by the proposed law.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>\u201cGiven US net international investment position is sharply negative, there is indeed scope for capital outflows if indeed S899 passes through the Senate in its current form,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>The impact of the bill won\u2019t be limited to European companies or individuals from those states.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>The bill \u201ccould significantly increase tax rates applicable to certain non-U.S. individuals and business, governmental, and other entities,\u201d said Max Levine, head of U.S. tax at the law firm Linklaters.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>This means it could also ensnare governments and central banks, which are large investors of U.S. Treasuries. France and Germany, for instance, held a combined $475 billion worth of U.S. government bonds as of March.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>The proposed tax would lower returns on U.S. Treasuries for those investors as \u201cthe de facto yield on US Treasuries would drop by nearly 100bps,\u201d Deutsche Bank\u2019s Saravelos added. \u201cThe adverse impact on demand for USTs and funding the US twin deficit at a time when this is most needed is clear\u201d.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>\u201cIt\u2019s very bad,\u201d said Beat Wittmann, chairman of Switzerland-based Porta Advisors. \u201cThis is huge \u2014 this is just one piece in the overall plan and it\u2019s completely consistent with what this administration is all about.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>\u201cThe ultimate judge for this is not our opinions, it\u2019s the bond market,\u201d Wittmann added. \u201cThe U.S. bond market is discounting these developments, and we have seen in the last few weeks, that if there was a safe haven move, investors clearly prefer German bunds.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>Large Australian pension funds with U.S. investments have also been reportedly concerned by the bill, since Australia operates a medicines subsidy scheme that is opposed by large U.S. pharmaceutical companies.<\/p>\n<p class='body-graf'>Legal experts at the Mayer Brown law firm suggest that \u201csignificant changes\u201d could be made to the bill as it passes through the U.S. Senate before it\u2019s enshrined into law by Trump.<\/p>\n<p class='endmark body-graf'>\u201cAs such, there may be questions about whether the provisions of the proposal that override tax treaties could be included in the US Senate\u2019s version of the tax bill,\u201d Mayer Brown\u2019s experts said.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div>This post appeared first on NBC NEWS<\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While U.S. President Donald Trump\u2019s tariffs play out in U.S. courts, another one of his proposed laws could weaponize the American tax system. Investment banks and law firms warn this step could prove to be as significant as the impact of duties on investors. The \u201cOne Big Beautiful Bill Act,\u201d which passed through the U.S.&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1207,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1206"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1206\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1207"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thetradingdictionary.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}